Big BIM – Little BIM: Does the scale really matter? Contrary to a prevailing misconception, BIM is not exclusively reserved for large-scale projects. In fact, the short answer is a resounding “no.” This exploration aims to unravel the myth surrounding BIM’s perceived scale limitations and shed light on its equal and efficient applicability in both large and small projects. Join us as we delve into the intricate dynamics of Big BIM and Little BIM, showcasing how BIM methodologies transcend project size to deliver optimized outcomes. In this journey, we highlight the versatility of BIM, where size becomes inconsequential in the pursuit of streamlined and effective project processes.
When we have a big BIM scale project, we will have:
- Big Team;
- Bigger Budgets;
- Bigger Time Period.
With the big BIM project the methods, procedures, and strategies would be totally different from the little BIM project.
For small-scale projects will we will need:
- Smaller Team;
- Smaller Budget ;
- Shorter Period of Time.
The common between the big BIM and little BIM scale projects is the goal. Even though the size does not matter, the important thing here is the improvement of:
- Quality of deliverables;
- Eliminate or minimize the waste;
- Decrease the Time Period;
- Reduce production and construction costs.
If we compare the project size and BIM benefits vs the time and the effort needed within the project, we would be seeing clearly the differences. So, would the scale of BIM implementation, depend on your goals? Of course, for big BIM projects, you will need bigger investments and time to fulfill the project, but then the return on investment will be higher as well. With the little BIM projects, you will have smaller goals to achieve. This means you will need a lower investment and a shorter time to finish it. As a result, the return on investment (ROI) corresponds to BIM and project objectives.
Big BIM – Little BIM – depends on your goals, project scale, and the results you want to achieve.
Navigating the landscape of construction and design introduces the nuanced consideration of Big BIM versus Little BIM. This decision is delicately influenced by project goals, scale, and envisioned outcomes. In scenarios of grand-scale projects with expansive teams and extended timelines, Big BIM takes the forefront, offering comprehensive strategies tailored to meet the demands of monumental endeavors. Conversely, Little BIM emerges as a strategic choice for smaller-scale projects, focusing on precision within more modest parameters.
Despite this apparent dichotomy, the shared pursuit of improvement remains constant—enhancing collaboration, communication, refining processes, and minimizing waste. The decision between Big BIM and Little BIM becomes deliberate, and intricately aligned with project objectives. The scale of BIM transforms into a dynamic variable, shaped by intentional calibration and the outcomes aspired to achieve.
In the realm of big BIM-scale projects, a substantial team, expansive budgets, and extended timeframes become the norm. The methods, procedures, and strategies employed in these projects differ significantly from their smaller counterparts. Conversely, small-scale projects necessitate a more modest team, limited budget, and shorter timeframes.
Despite the apparent differences in scale, the overarching goal remains consistent for both big and little BIM projects. The focus revolves around enhancing collaboration, communication, processes, workflows, and the overall quality of deliverables. Additionally, BIM implementation aims to eliminate or minimize waste, reduce the time required for project completion, and curtail production and construction costs.
When scrutinizing the relationship between project size and the benefits of BIM against the time and effort invested, distinctions become evident. The scale of BIM implementation is intricately tied to the specific goals set for the project. For significant BIM endeavors, substantial investments and time commitments are requisite, but the return on investment (ROI) proportionately matches the scale of the project. On the flip side, little BIM projects come with more attainable objectives, requiring lower investments and shorter timelines, yet yielding commensurate ROI in alignment with the project’s goals.
In essence, the choice between Big BIM and Little BIM hinges on your project’s objectives, scale, and desired outcomes. The video linked here delves deeper into this discussion, providing valuable insights into optimizing BIM strategies for projects of all sizes: Contact us to Explore BIM’s Full Potential!